Connect with us

FOOTBALL

Indiana Football Roundtable: Taking stock in Hoosiers midway through fall camp

Published

on

The HoosierIllustrated.com staff takes a stab at some of the key questions and topics associated with the Indiana football program. (Andrew Mascharka/Indiana Athletics)

The Indiana football program heads into the back-half of fall camp following its first scrimmage over the weekend. There have been several standouts throughout the first eight practices of camp and now, going into week three it’s critical for others to step up, including the quarterbacks.

There are numerous storylines for the program coming out of the scrimmage.

The HoosierIllustrated.com staff takes a stab at some of the key questions and topics associated with the Hoosiers heading into second-half of fall camp and the beginning of the season.

Who is your starting QB and why?

Kyler Staley: Tayven Jackson, and it shouldn’t even be that hard of a decision for Tom Allen. Yes, Brendan Sorsby has been with the program longer and knows what to expect, but there is a reason that coach Allen went out and got Jackson after he transferred out of Tennessee. Jackson is the QB of the future for this program. In my opinion, Jackson is the more talented QB of the 2 redshirt freshmen and provides more options than Sorsby and with the offensive line still a major question heading into the season, you need a QB that can extend plays like Jackson. Yes, Jackson will make mistakes, which is ok, but you have to let Jackson run the show from day 1 and learn.

Drew Rosenberg: Tayven Jackson. While there are question marks surrounding Jackson and the run dominant offense he played in at Center Grove, he has the highest ceiling of the QBs on the roster. Jackson has good physical traits for the position, a big-time arm that will only improve with time and he can make plays with his feet. When Jackson committed to Indiana, Tom Allen spoke about his leadership and the “confidence and swagger” that he brings. This offense needs leadership and some swagger and Tayven Jackson can bring that.

Alec Lasley: Although the quarterback battle has been a struggle up to this point, I think Tayven Jackson needs to be that guy under center for Indiana on Sept. 2. Jackson, an Indiana native, comes from Tennessee through the transfer portal and arrives in Bloomington as a former high four-star prospect. The reason he’s the guy is the upside and the expectations that have come with after landing him this offseason. Indiana came into this summer needing a more athletic and dual-threat quarterback. Jackson has that potential and ability — he’s just young. Tom Allen said that Jackson brings a moxie and confidence to the offensive unit and to each throw. The Indiana offense needs someone with unwavering confidence and a swag that is hasn’t had in years. Jackson really needs to be that guy.

Who is your breakout player on offense (not including Jaylin Lucas) and why?

Kyler Staley: For me, it is a tie between both tight end’s Aaron Steinfeldt and James Bomba. With the departure of stud tight end AJ Barner (transfer to Michigan), there provides many opportunities for either Steinfeldt or Bomba to step up. It is no secret that Tom Allen likes to use his tight ends in the passing game. Both are only redshirt sophomores so there is still some growth there, but last season they showed promise and potential. One, or both, are bound to breakout for the Hoosiers this season.

Drew Rosenberg: Cam Camper. Prior to tearing his ACL, Camper was a bright spot for Indiana, catching 46 passes for 569 yards in seven games. After his injury, the Hoosiers passing game fell apart. In games Camper played in, the team averaged 271 passing yards. That number dropped to 142 yards per game when Camper did not play. While his recovery from the injury is a concern, he is on track to be ready to go for week one against Ohio State and I believe he will re-establish himself as Indiana’s number one wide receiver.

Alec Lasley: I think this will be Josh Henderson. Henderson is coming off of a season in which he had 90 carries for 398 yards and four touchdowns. He also had 24 receptions for 274 yards and four receiving touchdowns. He is the second-leading returning receiver for Indiana and leader in receiving touchdowns. His ability to impact the game as a runner or pass catcher was evident a season ago. With a young quarterback, the running back can be his best friend. Tom Allen raved about Henderson this fall and the growing confidence he has on the field and as a leader.

Which side of the ball do you think will see the biggest improvement year-to-year and why?

Kyler Staley: This is truly a tough question because you could make a strong case for either side. However, I think with Allen handing the keys to co-defensive coordinator Matt Guerrieri to call the defense, the offense should see improvement. The result of Allen not being as hands on the defensive side will allow better game management. Plus, I strongly believe the talent is a ton better on the offensive side than what it has been the past two years. It all comes down to the offensive line for me.

Drew Rosenberg: Defense. 2022 was a rough year for Tom Allen’s defense, allowing 33.9 points per game. Adding Andre Carter from Western Michigan was one of the highlights of the offseason and he will play a big role in this new-look Indiana pass rush that has added a ton of new faces in the transfer portal. Aaron Casey returns at linebacker after leading Indiana in tackles (86) and tackles for loss (10.5) in 2022 and will have a massive role. With the mix of new and returning talent, Indiana’s defense could be in for an improved 2023.

Alec Lasley: Both sides of the ball have been dreadful to say the least over the last two seasons. But, I think the offense will see a much bigger lift than the defense this year. Year one under Walt Bell saw a lot of growing pains, but with an expected dual-threat quarterback, things should open up. The biggest area of improvement, however, was at the skill positions. Indiana went out and added playmakers to its wide receiver room and will likely have a much more versatile running back room. The offensive line is getting good reviews thanks to the addition of Bob Bostad, and even if that unit turns out to be average, that will be a far cry from what they have been the past two years.

Who is your breakout player on defense (not including Andre Carter) and why?

Kyler Staley: One of the bigger areas on Indiana’s defense that needs to show more production this season is the linebacker unit. A guy that I could see stepping up while breaking out is grad transfer Jacob Mangum-Farrar from Stanford. He comes in with the experience playing at the power five level and has the size, quickness and strength a linebacker needs to play in the Big Ten. At the linebacker position, Indiana needed improved versatility in that area and that is what Mangum-Farrar brings.

Drew Rosenberg: Jamier Johnson. During Indiana’s spring game, Johnson made his presence known, intercepting a jump ball from Tayven Jackson intended for 6-foot-3 WR E.J Williams in the end zone. Indiana’s secondary has plenty of uncertainty heading into the 2023 season after losing Tiawan Mullen and Jaylin Williams. The former four-star recruit and Texas transfer should be in line to play a big part on defense and help fill their roles. While Johnson played sparingly during his time at Texas, he is a long and athletic corner that should fit right into Tom Allen’s defense.

Alec Lasley: I do think Jacob Mangum-Farrar and Jamier Johnson will play significant roles this season as well. But, I like the addition of outside linebacker Lanell Carr and what he can bring this season. The West Virginia transfer made an immediate impact in spring practice with ‘a burst that we haven’t had at that spot,’ per Tom Allen. Carr has good size at 6-foot-2 and 240 pounds and brings a quickness to the edge that Indiana needs. Depending where he lines up, he could be on the same side as Andre Carter which could open things up even more. Look for Carr to make an immediate impact the rest of fall camp and into the season.

Which transfer — on either side of the ball — will have the biggest impact this year (not including Andre Carter)?

Kyler Staley: Andre Carter aside, the transfer I am most excited to see this season is grad transfer wide receiver DeQuece Carter. Carter has just been a proven stud and playmaker at Fordham and brings maturity and explosiveness to Indiana’s offense this season. There are questions as to if he can bring that same production to the Big Ten level, but he looks as someone that wants to step up and be a ‘go to’ options for whoever the QB is for the Hoosiers.

Drew Rosenberg: Tayven Jackson. If Jackson wins the quarterback battle, he will be the most important transfer on the roster. QB play will determine the success of this team just like it has the last four seasons. The success the Hoosiers saw in 2019 (8-5) and 2020 (6-2) started at the QB position with Michael Penix and Peyton Ramsey. 2021 (2-10) and 2022 (4-8) were plagued by poor QB play and the team struggled as a result. If Jackson is able to find success, the team could take a step forward after taking big steps backwards in 2021 and 2022.

Alec Lasley: With so many transfers this offseason — 23 overall — there are numerous players who will play large roles for Indiana. The one that I think Indiana sees the biggest impact from is EJ Williams. The Clemson transfer arrives in Bloomington with a lot to prove and he said it himself. The former top-50 prospect in the 2020 recruiting class had a terrific freshman season but fell off the two years following. As a freshman, he had 24 receptions for 306 yards and two touchdowns. He had his best game, with five catches for 45 yards in the Sugar Bowl vs. No. 3 Ohio State. The 6-foot-3 Williams caught seven passes for 70 yards in 242 offensive snaps and 13 games in 2022. The talent is there, now it’s about consistency. With Cam Camper still a bit limited, Williams has been given a golden opportunity to showcase that skillset. 

What is Indiana’s biggest ‘swing game’ in order to help them have a shot at being bowl eligible?

Kyler Staley: That Louisville game at Lucas Oil Stadium is really interesting on paper. The Ohio State game aside, this is the first true test for the Hoosiers as both Indiana and Louisville come into the season with so many questions. If the Hoosiers were to beat Indiana State in Week 2, then go onto win the Louisville game followed by winning vs Akron at home, the Hoosiers could easily start the season at 3-1 thus already being halfway to bowl eligibility. It’ll be very early in the season, but that Louisville game is so important on so many levels. A win there against a good football program like Louisville could be the much-needed confidence booster the Hoosiers need to make that bowl push.

Drew Rosenberg: Louisville. This game will be critical to the Hoosiers’ chances of earning bowl eligibility. Playing in the Big Ten East means you have to take care of business in your non-conference schedule and for Indiana, winning all three is critical. Winning games in the Big Ten is not easy, but if Indiana sweeps their non-conference schedule, they only need three more wins for bowl eligibility. Louisville is the only Power Five school of the three and with them traveling to Lucas Oil Stadium, an Indiana victory would be crucial to earning bowl eligibility.

Alec Lasley: This is a toss-up for me because there are a few that I think can go either way and are games that can really jumpstart the season for IU or get them over the hump. Like the others, I go with Louisville. This is a week three game after Ohio State and Indiana State. The Hoosiers will have the luxury of playing a team like Ohio State in the opener to get them ready for power five opponents, so the talent level of Louisville shouldn’t be surprising to them when they step on the field. It’s a game at Lucas Oil, so still a ‘home game’ for the Hoosiers. And, it’s only game three for Jeff Brohm, with some early-season growing pains surely to be getting worked out. If Indiana can get that one under its belt, it would take some of the pressure off of matchups with Maryland, Illinois and Purdue to potentially get that critically-important sixth win. 

Prediction on Indiana’s final record

Kyler Staley: Final record of 6-6 is my prediction, which would allow Indiana to sneak into some sort of bowl game. When looking at the schedule for the Hoosiers, there are only realistically two games that are guaranteed wins (Indiana State, Akron). After that, things are real unclear. Like mentioned previously, the neutral site game vs Louisville could be a major opportunity for them to build momentum for a bowl push. As far as true road games, I really only see Indiana going on the road and beating Purdue. If Indiana wants to get to its first bowl in three seasons, it’s going to need to steal some games they aren’t expected to win. 6-6 is surprisingly doable in my opinion, but it’s going to be a grind.

Drew Rosenberg: 5-7. I think Indiana will improve from 2022, but the strength of the Big Ten will make it difficult to earn bowl eligibility. The Hoosiers are in a tough place and to win five games would be a decent season in the Big Ten East. I predict they will beat Akron, Indiana State, Rutgers and Michigan State. That fifth win could come from a few different games, but the most likely games Indiana could snag that victory would be either Louisville, Purdue, Illinois or possibly Maryland, but all four will be difficult.

Alec Lasley: I think 5-7 is very realistic for Indiana and while there is a path to six wins, it’s just hard to see Indiana winning all of those 50-50 matchups and having the ball bounce its way in that many swing games. The key games for Indiana will be Louisville, Rutgers, Illinois and Purdue in my opinion. Getting two wins is something you need to shoot for which leaves two wins against Indiana State and Akron getting you to at least four. Then, you look at a home game against Michigan State as a possibility or the likelihood that you get three wins out of those four matchups mentioned above. Five wins is definitely not a stretch, but at the end of the day, the quarterback situation will determine the outcome for Indiana and right now that’s still a question mark.

SEE ALSO: Indiana Football Notebook: Key quotes, notes and more following first fall camp scrimmage

Make sure to follow Hoosier Illustrated on Twitter @Indiana_FRN, Facebook and YouTube to stay up to date on all of the news, updates and coverage of Indiana University athletics. 

FOOTBALL

Indiana football resumes Big Ten play as two-touchdown underdogs against Maryland

Published

on

Indiana football, Tom Allen
The Indiana football program enters week five against Maryland next weekend as a two-touchdown plus underdog. (Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports)

The Indiana football program resumes Big Ten play on Saturday against Maryland and will have a hefty task ahead of them.

Indiana (2-2) opens up as a two-touchdown underdog to Maryland. The initial line is at 14.5-points, per FanDuel Sports. It has flexed anywhere from 14.5 to 16 points depending on different betting sites.

Maryland is 4-0 and coming off of a 31-9 win over Michigan State on Saturday. Taulia Tagovailoa leads a high-powered offense as he leads the Big Ten in passing yards at 1,112. He is also tied for the most touchdown passes (8) in the league, fourth in quarterback rating (148.7) and has only been sacked twice.

The Terps also have a versatile rushing attack. Colby McDonald leads the Big Ten in yards per carry among runners with at least 25 attempts. He averages 7.8 yards per carry. He has 204 yards and two touchdowns. Roman Hemby leads the rushing attack, however, with 255 yards and a 5.1 yard per carry average. He also has four touchdowns.

Receiving wise, Maryland has three pass catchers in the top-16 in the Big Ten in total yardage — all over 195 yards.

Indiana is coming off of a four-overtime win against Akron in week three. The Hoosiers were out gained 473 to just 282. Akron had 24 first downs compared to 14 for IU. Indiana was 3-of-14 on third downs, averaging 7.7 yards per third down, and had just four drives longer than four plays all night.

Trending: Indiana Football haunted by miscues in 4OT win against Akron

Four of the five second-half possessions before overtime consisted of the following: three plays for three yards, three plays for two yards, three plays for six yards and three plays for zero yards.

Tayven Jackson, in his second start as the official starter, had his worst performance so far this season — one built around ‘growing pains’. He was just 11-of-26 passing for 190 yards with one touchdown and one interception.

“We got to execute better in practice. We play a Big Ten team next week, and what we did out there today is not going to cut it,” Jackson said. “So we got to be better on Sunday and Monday, and the rest of the week.”

Kick is set for 3:30 pm ET on Big Ten Network next Saturday.

“I was looking for opportunities and did not like at all how we practiced. We actually restarted some things on Thursday. And from what you’re just saying right there, I just sense the lack of understanding who we were playing and their ability to beat you and so — which is mind blowing because we don’t have any right to think that at this point,” Allen said. “So — but did sense it for sure. Didn’t like what I was seeing. But at the same time didn’t effectively get their attention for sure, especially not on certain areas of the game.”

SEE ALSO: Indiana Football Notebook: Final thoughts, takeaways from week four

Make sure to follow Hoosier Illustrated on Twitter @Indiana_FRN, Facebook and YouTube to stay up to date on all of the news, updates and coverage of Indiana University athletics. You can also listen to the Talking’ Bout the Hoosiers podcast on Spotify.

Continue Reading

FOOTBALL

Indiana Football haunted by miscues in 4OT win against Akron

Published

on

Indiana football
Indiana's Tayven Jackson scrambles during the second half of the Indiana versus Akron football game at Memorial Stadium. © Rich Janzaruk/Herald Times / USA TODAY NETWORK

Indiana football pulled off a miracle in its win over Akron. Yes, you read that right, it was a miracle the Hoosiers won this game. A game they were 16.5 point favorites at home against a team from the Mid-American Conference took a miracle for Indiana to win.

With less than 5 seconds remaining and the game tied at 17, Akron missed a 32 yard field goal that would have won them the game. Instead, Indiana football pulled out the victory in the 4th overtime when they pulled off a variation of the famous ‘Philly Special’ to give them the victory.

Indiana did not deserve to win this game. Miscues, penalties and poor play-calling put them in a position to lose. The offense never seemed to get going and some critical drops in big moments were almost fatal for Indiana.

In the first quarter, Indiana was driving into Akron territory when, on 3rd down, Tayven Jackson found an uncovered Donaven McCulley. While Jackson’s pass was a touch low, it should have been a routine catch for the former quarterback turned wide receiver. Instead of the touchdown that should have been, the ball bounced off of the hands of McCulley and Indiana was forced to punt.

Indiana seemed unfocused at times and unprepared for the Akron Zips and Tom Allen believes it started at practice this past week.

“I was looking for opportunities and did not like at all how we practiced. We actually restarted some things on Thursday,” Allen said postgame. “… I just sense the lack of understanding who we were playing and their ability to beat you and so — which is mind-blowing because we don’t have any right to think that at this point.”

Drops weren’t the only mistakes that haunted the Hoosiers Saturday night. Poor play-calling, especially in the red zone, was a killer for Indiana.

After Louis Moore’s first interception of the night, Indiana had the ball at the Akron four yard line with a chance to go up 14. Offensive Coordinator Walt Bell proceeded to call two runs for Christian Turner, who was stuffed both times.

On 3rd down, Indiana went to a wildcat formation with Donaven McCulley, who could not score on the QB keeper. On 4th down at the one yard line, Walt Bell decided to run it again. And again it ended with the same result as McCulley was stuffed and Indiana turned it over on downs.

In the second half, Indiana was in a similar position, leading by four with the ball at the Akron 2 yard line for 2nd and goal. Indiana attempted to run it up the middle twice, first with running back Christian Turner and then with Tayven Jackson, who were both stuffed, forcing the Hoosiers to settle for a field goal from the one yard line.

Their inability to score touchdowns in goal to go situations nearly cost them another game. Just one week ago, Indiana lost against Louisville because they could not convert from the one-yard line.

“You’re at the goal line, you’ve got to score touchdowns and not have to kick field goals,” Allen said about their struggles to finish drives. “Obviously, got stopped on the 1 before. We chose to kick a football from inside the one. But, yeah, it starts up front. Got to block better.”

The lack of creativity and execution inside the red zone is a real concern for Indiana football right now. With Indiana heading into the heart of the schedule, something needs to change fast or it could be a long season for Hoosier football fans.

Penalties have been another issue for Indiana football this season. Some poorly timed penalties hurt the Hoosiers and, frankly, there were a lot of avoidable ones.

While Indiana only lost 50 yards on five penalties, a few offsetting ones and more hurt the Hoosiers. With Akron leading by three, Indiana jumped offside, giving them the free shot down the field, which was caught for 28 yards.

Mental mistakes have haunted the Hoosiers all season and Saturday was no different. If not for three interceptions from the defense, including one for a score, Saturday could have been much darker for Indiana football.

While the three turnovers forced were big for Indiana, some poor tackling and containment allowed Akron QB DJ Irons to rush for 141 yards and two touchdowns. Indiana had chances to get him down but he seemed to evade a defender’s grasp every time it came down to it. In overtime, Irons made Indiana defensive end Andre Carter miss while scrambling for a 10 yard touchdown.

All three phases were bad for Indiana in this one. After Akron scored to take the lead, they went for the onside kick which was recovered off the hands of wide receiver DeQuece Carter. The defense forced a big stop on the ensuing drive to prevent any damage, but it could have been a lot worse.

It seemed like Indiana was lost in all phases of the game against an inferior opponent and it almost cost them a game they came into as huge favorites.

Ultimately, Indiana was lucky to beat Akron. With the team traveling to face Maryland next week, something has to change if the Hoosiers are going to have any shot at beating the undefeated Terps.

SEE ALSO: Indiana Football Notebook: Final thoughts, takeaways from week four

Make sure to follow Hoosier Illustrated on Twitter @Indiana_FRN, Facebook and YouTube to stay up to date on all of the news, updates and coverage of Indiana University athletics. You can also listen to the Talking’ Bout the Hoosiers podcast on Spotify.

Continue Reading

FOOTBALL

Tayven Jackson has ‘growing pains’ in 4OT win as Indiana football offense stumbles again

Published

on

Indiana football QB Tayven Jackson
Tayven Jackson had his first tough outing on Saturday as the offense for Indiana football struggled in a major way. (Rich Janzaruk/Herald Times-USA TODAY NETWORK)

There is no question that the Indiana football offense has struggled all year and Saturday night may have been the tip of the iceberg.

Look no further than the third overtime two-point conversion attempt. Indiana had a wide open Jaylin Lucas — nobody was within 10 yards of him — in the end zone. Instead, it was an incomplete pass that forced overtime number four.

But, it’s what quarterback Tayven Jackson said following the game that is more jarring.

“He’s not my read. It’s 1-2-3, and then get out of there, so I’ve never looked at Jaylin ever running that play in practice,” Jackson said. “So, I know he’s butt naked (open), but it’s not my read.”

Jaylin Lucas had 10 receptions for 98 yards and one touchdown in week three. On Saturday, Lucas had zero targets. Yes, zero. Now, it’s on both Jackson and the coaching staff to progress and find ways to make this offense more effective going into Big Ten play.

“For me, it’s seeing signals and being better at reading the defense,” Jackson said of his development. “I got rushed a little bit, and I was trying to force things, and that’s never good. But as a team, we just need to have better focus.”

Jackson finished 11-of-26 passing for 190 yards with one touchdown and one interception. High throws, tunnel vision at times and young mistakes reared their head for the redshirt freshman who was making his third start of the season — and second since being named the official starter.

‘Growing pains’ is how head coach Tom Allen described it following the win.

“It was a tough night. Definitely wasn’t his best,” Allen said. ” … We had some open receivers we didn’t hit. We had three critical drops. One where it would have been a touchdown early on. Just lack of focus. That’s really what it is. So those three drops hurt us. And then just not being able to execute. So just growing pains, without question.”

The big play early on was a deep ball down the field to Donaven McCulley — which resulted in a wide-open drop. Omar Cooper had a drop later in the game and there were times that Jackson starred down receivers too much.

All parts that Jackson owned.

“They were on me,” Jackson said. ‘That drop that Donny (McCulley) had was one me. I put it at the knees and I should have put it higher for him to catch that ball easy. All the other drops were on me. They weren’t perfect throws. Unless they’re absolutely perfect throws, then we can talk about it. But it was on me.”

Jackson has now had three starts of 18-of-21 passing, 24-of-34 passing and then Saturday’s game of 11-of-26. 85.7 percent passing, then 70.6 percent and 42.3 percent.

On the season, Jackson has thrown for 749 yards on 62.8 percent passing with two touchdowns and two interceptions.

In total, Indiana football was out gained 473 to just 282. The Zips had 24 first downs compared to 14 for IU. Indiana was 3-of-14 on third downs, averaging 7.7 yards per third down, and had just four drives longer than four plays all night.

Four of the five second-half possessions before overtime consisted of the following: three plays for three yards, three plays for two yards, three plays for six yards and three plays for zero yards.

“We got to execute better in practice. We play a Big Ten team next week, and what we did out there today is not going to cut it,” Jackson said. “So we got to be better on Sunday and Monday, and the rest of the week.”

“Not good enough. Not even close,” Allen echoed .”Below the standard. Below what’s acceptable, for sure.”

SEE ALSO: Indiana Football Notebook: Final thoughts, takeaways from week four

Make sure to follow Hoosier Illustrated on Twitter @Indiana_FRN, Facebook and YouTube to stay up to date on all of the news, updates and coverage of Indiana University athletics. You can also listen to the Talking’ Bout the Hoosiers podcast on Spotify.

Continue Reading

Trending